<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JohnMark.org Headquarters &#187; bruce schneier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnmark.org/blog/tag/bruce-schneier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnmark.org/blog</link>
	<description>Just another John Mark production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 09:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Schneier Makes Uncorroborated Claims About Google Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmark.org/blog/2010/01/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnmark.org/blog/2010/01/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce schneier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ostatic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier has built a successful career as a computer security guru – one who gets it right most of the time and has a wonderful ability to translate security concerns to the layman. But sometimes an author's great reputation makes him less like...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Bruce Schneier has built a successful career as a computer security guru – one who gets it right most of the time and has a wonderful ability to translate security concerns to the layman. But sometimes an author&#8217;s great reputation makes him less likely to criticize his own work, and the editorial staff of whatever media organization he happens to be writing for, in this case CNN, lazy.So when Bruce Schneier asserts that Chinese hackers exploited a government-mandated backdoor to abscond with information on human rights activists, you kind of take it for granted that there is, in fact, a back door that they exploited. Except when there&#8217;s not. Or there might be, but Schneier unfortunately offers few facts and cites no sources, and I haven&#8217;t found any other report to corroborate his assertion.Read the article:</p>
<p>in reference to:
</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Schneier Makes Uncorroborated Claims About Google Hack&#8221;- <a href="http://ostatic.com/blog/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack">Schneier Makes Uncorroborated Claims About Google Hack</a> (<a href="http://www.google.com/sidewiki/entry/porkrind/id/F3E0YWfCu0B-5yv2ZGeUdDjs8t8">view on Google Sidewiki</a>)</p></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/34697260-433304992082067169?l=tinosc.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>
<p><map name='google_ad_map_2579_bdfb6b8d2a9af00f'>
<area shape='rect' href='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/2579?pos=0' coords='1,2,367,28' />
<area shape='rect' href='http://services.google.com/feedback/abg' coords='384,10,453,23'/></map>
<img usemap='#google_ad_map_2579_bdfb6b8d2a9af00f' border='0' src='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&amp;client=&amp;channel=&amp;output=png&amp;cuid=2579&amp;url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.johnmark.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F01%2Fschneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack%2F' /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnmark.org/blog/2010/01/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schneier Makes Uncorroborated Claims About Google Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmark.org/blog/2010/01/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.johnmark.org/blog/2010/01/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Syndicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backdoor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce schneier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ostatic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmark.org/blog/?guid=99716a22c9a76c7d6e3a7d3b5dee0ddf</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Schneier has built a successful career as a computer security guru – one who gets it right most of the time and has a wonderful ability to translate security concerns to the layman. But sometimes an author's great reputation makes him less like...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Bruce Schneier has built a successful career as a computer security guru – one who gets it right most of the time and has a wonderful ability to translate security concerns to the layman. But sometimes an author&#8217;s great reputation makes him less likely to criticize his own work, and the editorial staff of whatever media organization he happens to be writing for, in this case CNN, lazy.</p>
<p>So when Bruce Schneier asserts that Chinese hackers exploited a government-mandated backdoor to abscond with information on human rights activists, you kind of take it for granted that there is, in fact, a back door that they exploited. Except when there&#8217;s not. Or there might be, but Schneier unfortunately offers few facts and cites no sources, and I haven&#8217;t found any other report to corroborate his assertion.</p>
<p>Read the article:</p>
<p>in reference to:
</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Schneier Makes Uncorroborated Claims About Google Hack&#8221;<br />- <a href="http://ostatic.com/blog/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack">Schneier Makes Uncorroborated Claims About Google Hack</a> (<a href="http://www.google.com/sidewiki/entry/porkrind/id/F3E0YWfCu0B-5yv2ZGeUdDjs8t8">view on Google Sidewiki</a>)</p></blockquote>
</div>
<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/34697260-433304992082067169?l=tinosc.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>
<p><map name='google_ad_map_3783_bdfb6b8d2a9af00f'>
<area shape='rect' href='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/3783?pos=0' coords='1,2,367,28' />
<area shape='rect' href='http://services.google.com/feedback/abg' coords='384,10,453,23'/></map>
<img usemap='#google_ad_map_3783_bdfb6b8d2a9af00f' border='0' src='http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&amp;client=&amp;channel=&amp;output=png&amp;cuid=3783&amp;url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.johnmark.org%2Fblog%2F2010%2F01%2Fschneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack-2%2F' /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.johnmark.org/blog/2010/01/schneier-makes-uncorroborated-claims-about-google-hack-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

