@amcpherson ...and cedes commu...
@amcpherson ...and cedes community dev (and its rewards) to the LF. Great for LF, bad for Intel. The community wins either way
@amcpherson ...and cedes community dev (and its rewards) to the LF. Great for LF, bad for Intel. The community wins either way
@amcpherson doesn't go against linux community, but it's not beneficial to intel. intel waves the white flag and admits they have no idea
@TechJournalist I still don't like it :)
@ragavan LOL... true that :)
@ragavan yeah, I hear you, but I think it's in Intel's interest to really follow through with that community. dunno why they dont see oppty
@amcpherson this is not the first time I'm commented on Intel's community ineptness: http://bit.ly/1vGdAE
@amcpherson Intel could have handled the project the "right way" and gotten loads of good PR for it. see, eg. @cdibona 's group
@amcpherson it was their one shot at community glory and they're giving that up. from community perspective, I don't see an advantage
sorry @jzemlin - I guess I have to be the odd crank who thinks Intel is dumb for turning over http://moblin.org/
RT @mlsrumors: We've learned that the ownership group will consist of Slim, Wilpon and Henry Kissinger - @zeruch gonna be cosmos fan?
GeekPAC submitted "GeekTrack" to @sunlightlabs Apps for America contest: http://bit.ly/uvW29 #opengov #geekpac
@mjasay URL?