Category: Syndicated

  • Diigo Bookmarks for johnmark

    Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
  • Diffing the Many Versions of the Stimulus Bill

    If you’ve been following the trajectory of the Stimulus bill as it winds its way through the house, senate, bicameral committee, back to the house, and then on to the senate for one final vote before going to the president, you might have a bit of an interest in the following:
    • just what is in the dang bill
    • what exactly has changed between each version
    Well, huzzah! Thanks to the open source version control tool Subversion, it was a rather simple task to whip together a repository of the bill and track the various changes between each version. See links below:To check out your own version of the repository, here’s your handy command:
    svn co http://www.geek-pac.org/svn/stimulus-bill
    And off you go!
  • 7 things you may (or may not) know about me

    …and may not have wanted to know. The illustrious Sara Dornsife tagged me – like, eons ago – to blog about the 7 things you may or may not know about me. It goes without saying that you may not have even wanted to know this, in which case you should avert your eyes now. I throw out tons of garbage on my twitter feed, with a high noise to signal ratio, so it’s quite possible that nobody knows anything about me. Well, no more!1. from the age of 8 until 12, I was basically homeschooled. Ok, so it was actually a tiny fundamentalist Christian school with about 9 or 10 other kids, but my father was the principal, my mother helped with teaching, and the other volunteers were mostly other kids’ parents, so it sure felt like home-schooling. When I was 12, we moved to hell^H^H^H^HCorning, AR, for which I never forgave my parents, and I attended a public school, where I soon learned the reward for being completely isolated from modern secular culture: incessant carping, bullying and a general sense of not belonging. There are those advocates of home-schooling who insist that socializing with other kids either doesn’t matter or can be ameliorated via other means. I beg to differ. The key is unsupervised play time. Home-schooled kids just don’t get enough of that – although I’m sure there are some enlightened parents out there. In any case, I always felt that those years left me at a disadvantage socially, an area where I didn’t feel “caught up” until my mid-to-late 20’s. I never did shake the feeling of isolation or not belonging, which I carry to this day.2. As mentioned in #1, I was raised in a fundamentalist protestant – Southern Baptist, to be exact – family. When I see documentaries like Jesus Camp, I completely identify with those people, even though I rejected the religion of my youth long ago. When I see paranoid morons going off half-cocked on cable news shows, I understand them completely – because I used to be one of them. I will always have a soft spot for children who believe in creationism, because I remember what it felt like to be “under siege” from the unsaved, to know that scientists were conspiring against God, to know that “the others”, ie. other colors, other religions, other nationalities, were assaulting our religious freedom, and that we had to prepare for the end times, assuming they weren’t already here.3. On account of #1 and #2, above, I was either born with or acquired at a very early age the desire to evangelize to others. In earlier days, it took a religious form, but now it takes the form of convincing others to embrace whatever I embrace, which are craft brewing, soccer, open source software, or whatever political arguments I’ve crafted. If I discover a new book or piece of music or interesting free software tool, then I want you to enjoy it, too. This is why I excel at my job – online community management (or “community organizing” if you will) and grassroots marketing.4. I am a shameless and unapologetic beer snob and am only too happy to lecture you ad nauseum about the joys of traditional Belgian brewing styles. Nothing raises my ire more quickly than that poor, unsuspecting Belgian person who doesn’t know their own country’s place in the pantheon of beer… and tells me Stella Artois is a pretty decent beer. Like hell, it is. And I especially enjoy being the killjoy who gets the honor of informing ignorant Germans or English that their brewers are, with a few notable exceptions, stagnant, bland, and behind the vangaurd of American brewers. Tee hee… Oh, and then there’s the matter of both countries killing off many of their traditional styles *sigh*.5. I enjoy finding the flaws in other people’s logic and clobbering them over the head with it. Especially when they’re ideological, free-market worshipping Republicans. And *especially* when they’re dittohead, cult-of-Rush koolaid drinkers… but then that’s like shooting fish in a barrel.6. I had an existential crisis when I was 12. I couldn’t convince myself that I wasn’t living inside someone else’s imagination – that everything I saw, smelled or touched wasn’t a complete fabrication inside someone else’s head. I finally got over it by deciding that I had to roll with it, whether it was someone else’s fabrication or “reality.” When I was 14, I couldn’t stop counting the number of letters in words I spoke or thought about and trying to find the right words that would make the letters per word average out to an integer. In both cases, I never told anyone until long afterwards. In the latter case, I sometimes still do it.7. I have somehow managed to find another human being and convince them to stay with me, even though she long ago caught on to my imperfections. God knows why. This is our 12th year, and it astounds even me. Before I met Cathy, I never lived in the same house for more than 2 or 3 years at a time, and we’re now in our 8th year in our Bay Area house. I still yearn to be a rolling stone, but I’ve learned the advantages and disadvantages of each.And, golly gee, but I guess I can’t stop talking about myself, so here goes…8. I continue to aspire to political office and have for many years. In fact, when I was 5 or 6, my 3 possible vocations were 1. scientist, 2. football player and 3. politician. My goal is to hold some office by 40. I still have 5 years 🙂

    Rules of this game according to @SaraD:

    • Link to your original tagger(s) and list these rules in your post.
    • Share seven facts about yourself in the post.
    • Tag seven people at the end of your post by leaving their names and the links to their blogs.
    • Let them know they’ve been tagged.
    So herewith, I tag the following victims (name, twitter ID, blog URL):
    1. Stephen Walli @stephenrwalli (blog)
    2. Stacey Schneider @sparkystacey (need to start a blog?)
    3. Lisa Hoover @lisah (blog) oops, she’s already been tagged. It’s a good read 🙂
    4. Joseph Arruda @zeruch (blog)
    5. Tony Guntharpe @fusion94 (blog)
    6. Jeff @toxic (blog)
    7. Angie Danielson-O’Keefe @SadieBug (blog)
  • The Free Software Song in a Previous Life

    All I can say is…. holy christ, this was 9 years ago. And it’s still just as embarrassing today as it was then – but because I’m further removed now, I can LMAO about it :)[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSkCny-HtTw&hl=en&fs=1]
  • Washington Post: Activist Parents and School Boards

    Here’s an interesting article I just discovered on the washington post all about how parents are using the internet to organize campaigns designed to influence their local schools. This can naturally be a positive thing, but also not.Read the full article here.This appears to be the worst of both worlds: 1. the school system is just closed enough that only the most well-connected parents with free time (read: wealthier) can break through to school administrations and 2. the school system is just open enough that these online campaigns do make an impact once off the ground.This type of impact can be positive, but it can also be short-sighted and geared only to the success of a select few. It would seem to me that the obvious solution is to create a truly open community for every school district on the web that engages with all parents, but somehow I don’t see most public school systems being that engaged or forward thinking – yet.
  • Telecom Overhaul, Part 2 – Now with Sarah Lacy

    Listening to this morning’s Forum program on KQED (highly recommended, by the way) the subject was about what constitutes “infrastructure” in the 21st century and how an Obama presidency would align his infrastructure priorities. There was discussion of the traditional pieces of infrastructure, ie. roads and bridges, and then there was plenty of discussion on 21st century infrastructure, ie. telecom. The main question is, how much in the way of financial resources to we devote to this newfangled telecom stuff? As I’ve argued previously, a lot.

    At this time, I will attempt to channel Nick Carr:
    1. the “big switch” to universal electricity brought about new business models that weren’t possible previously
    2. a similar phenomenon would accompany a shift to ubiquitous, “always-on” broadband that penetrated every sector of the country.
    And switching back to my usual themes:
    1. the original “big switch” required a metric crap load of government investment and resources
    2. so would the 21st century equivalent
    3. lots of companies would form around these new initiatives and grow, generating wealth for a new middle class
    Look, it’s not complicated – if we want a 21st century economy that allows us to maintain our global technology edge, we need this. Cheap, plentiful broadband in the form of end-to-end fiber optic cable as well as new wimax technologies would allow companies to form as cloud services, as well as companies in traditional markets looking to gain an edge by making use of the new cloud services and service providers. It’s a win-win for everyone.

    As a footnote, I’ll point out that Sarah Lacy was most disappointing when interviewed on Forum. She apparently reduced these initiatives down to working in coffee shops and giving poor kids access to broadband. Not that I mind either of these, of course, but she misses the larger point – this sort of large-scale investment by the federal government would inject a great deal of energy into our present and future economic growth. Our economy right now absolutely relies on a strong IT component, and it only makes sense that future economic growth hinges on our IT investment.

    Boo, Sarah – it’s the economy, stupid.
  • The Inevitable Decline of Deregulated Markets Into Crony Capitalism

    It must be said that one of the most pernicious trends in government has been the resolute path toward libertarian ideology with the desire for a laissez faire utopia trumping all pragmatism and good sense. We’ve tried this deregulation experiment a few times now with mostly disastrous results: 1. California energy deregulation and 2. US banking deregulation. One would think that libertarian ideologues would at some point need to present actual evidence that their deregulation fantasies can come to fruition. As yet, none exists. Can we now agree that the natural result of market deregulation is almost necessarily graft, corruption and crony capitalism? As with peace activists and pacifists, libertarianism is too naive and dependent on the goodness of other humans.Take a survey of the world’s industrialized economies, both now and since the beginning of industrialization. One would be hard pressed to find just one that fit the model of a libertarian’s ideal state. That’s because such a state doesn’t occur in nature. Just as the middle class does not naturally occur without the assistance of a strong central government (and progressive taxes, natch), so too is a well-oiled, corruption-free, strong capitalist economy accompanied by a government that intervenes on behalf of its constituents, balancing the needs of all parties such that one cannot completely dominate all the others. This is not the same as mandating income equality, which is a pointless exercise, but rather a system of checks and balances to ensure that hard work does not go unrewarded.Let us now enjoy our new foray into Socialist Democracy.
  • The Inevitable Decline of Deregulated Markets Into Crony Capitalism

    It must be said that one of the most pernicious trends in government has been the resolute path toward libertarian ideology with the desire for a laissez faire utopia trumping all pragmatism and good sense. We’ve tried this deregulation experiment a few times now with mostly disastrous results: 1. California energy deregulation and 2. US banking deregulation. One would think that libertarian ideologues would at some point need to present actual evidence that their deregulation fantasies can come to fruition. As yet, none exists. Can we now agree that the natural result of market deregulation is almost necessarily graft, corruption and crony capitalism? As with peace activists and pacifists, libertarianism is too naive and dependent on the goodness of other humans.

    Take a survey of the world’s industrialized economies, both now and since the beginning of industrialization. One would be hard pressed to find just one that fit the model of a libertarian’s ideal state. That’s because such a state doesn’t occur in nature. Just as the middle class does not naturally occur without the assistance of a strong central government (and progressive taxes, natch), so too is a well-oiled, corruption-free, strong capitalist economy accompanied by a government that intervenes on behalf of its constituents, balancing the needs of all parties such that one cannot completely dominate all the others. This is not the same as mandating income equality, which is a pointless exercise, but rather a system of checks and balances to ensure that hard work does not go unrewarded.

    Let us now enjoy our new foray into Socialist Democracy.